- 20 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
barthc authored
-
- 03 Jun, 2016 2 commits
-
-
James Lopez authored
This reverts commit 3e991230.
-
James Lopez authored
# Conflicts: # app/models/project.rb
-
- 16 May, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Sean McGivern authored
Before: we took the next milestone due across all projects in the search and found issues whose milestone title matched that one. Problems: 1. The milestone could be closed. 2. Different projects have milestones with different schedules. 3. Different projects have milestones with different titles. 4. Different projects can have milestones with different schedules, but the _same_ title. That means we could show issues from a past milestone, or one that's far in the future. After: gather the ID of the next milestone on each project we're looking at, and find issues with those milestone IDs. Problems: 1. For a lot of projects, this can return a lot of IDs. 2. The SQL query has to be different between Postgres and MySQL, because MySQL is much more lenient with HAVING: as well as the columns appearing in GROUP BY or in aggregate clauses, MySQL allows them to appear in the SELECT list (un-aggregated).
-
Sean McGivern authored
- Don't do setup in spec bodies. - Don't `describe` a symbol. - Don't use 'should'.
-
- 13 Apr, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Yorick Peterse authored
This ensures that IssuableFinder returns a collection of unique issues, even when filtering issues using multiple labels.
-
- 07 Oct, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Closes #2619 Closes https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/issues/9631
-
- 27 May, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
- 30 Apr, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Dominik Sander authored
This groups milestones by title for issue views like it has been done for the milestone dashboard/project overview. Before milestones with the same title would show up multiple times in the filter dropdown and one could only filter per project and milestone. Now the milestone filter is based on the title of the milestone, i.e. all issues marked with the same milestone title are shown.
-
- 12 Feb, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Jeroen van Baarsen authored
Signed-off-by: Jeroen van Baarsen <jeroenvanbaarsen@gmail.com>
-
- 05 Dec, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
- 25 Feb, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
- 10 Feb, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
- 15 Jan, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
- 25 Dec, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
- 08 Aug, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- 18 Jul, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Izaak Alpert authored
Trying to retrigger travis Change-Id: Ifd86fb4c6b2791ad176230254fbf69a9ade979fb
-
Izaak Alpert authored
The good: - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work). - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate The questionable: - Events only know about target projects - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target - All operations performed in the satellite The bad: - Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between) (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos) Fixes: Make test repos/satellites only create when needed -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap) -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually -fixed remote removal -How to merge renders properly -Update emails to show project/branches -Edit MR doesn't set target branch -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test -Added back a test around merge request observer -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well -Signifant speed ups for tests -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests -Remove wiki schema update Fixes for search/search results -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
-