BigW Consortium Gitlab

  1. 04 Aug, 2016 4 commits
  2. 03 Aug, 2016 3 commits
  3. 02 Aug, 2016 2 commits
  4. 01 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  5. 30 Jul, 2016 4 commits
  6. 29 Jul, 2016 26 commits
    • Clarify which project is deleted to avoid alarm · 9eb10024
      Stan Hu authored
      Closes #13654
    • Properly abort a merge when merge conflicts occur · 60529e02
      Stan Hu authored
      If somehow a user attempted to accept a merge request that had
      conflicts (e.g. the "Accept Merge Request" button or the MR itself was
      not updated), `MergeService` did not properly detect that a conflict
      occurred. It would assume that the MR went through without any issues
      and close the MR as though everything was fine. This could cause
      data loss if the source branch were removed.
      
      Closes #20425
    • Merge branch 'fix/import-project-hooks' into 'master' · 6ad514d0
      Douwe Maan authored
      fix repo hooks missing on import
      
      Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19556 
      
      Repo hooks are missing from imported projects
      
      - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
      - Tests
        - [x] Added for this feature/bug
        - [x] All builds are passing
      - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
      - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
      - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
      
      See merge request !5549
    • Merge branch 'ability-batch-issue-checking' into 'master' · dac2e0c4
      Robert Speicher authored
      Optimize checking if a user can read multiple issues
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      This optimizes various parts of the code so it can more efficiently check if a user can read a list of issues.
      
      ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
      
      Yes, in particular `Ability.issues_readable_by_user` should be checked to make sure it correctly allows/restricts access to issues.
      
      ## Why was this MR needed?
      
      Currently the general approach to checking if one can read an issue is to iterate over the issues to check and call `can?(user, :read_issue, issue)` for every issue. This is not efficient as the same work has to be done for every issue.
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      * #15607 
      * #17463
      
      See merge request !5370
    • Merge branch 'rubocop/enable-access-modifiers-cops' into 'master' · 34c083a1
      Robert Speicher authored
      Enable Rubocop cops that check access modifiers
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      This MR enables Rubocop cops that detect methods that should be restricted but are the part of public API because of access modifiers used improperly.
      
      This also fixes existing offenses.
      
      ## Why was this MR needed?
      
      Some method in our codebase are public instead of being private because it is sometimes difficult to get it right without static analysis.
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      See #17478  
      Closes #17372 
      
      See merge request !5014
    • Merge branch 'refactor/ci-config-move-job-entries' into 'master' · 4284724d
      Rémy Coutable authored
      Move CI job config entries from legacy to new config
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      This MR extracts jobs configuration logic from legacy CI config processor to the new code.
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      #15060
      
      ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
      
      - Tests
        - [x] Added for this feature/bug
        - [x] All builds are passing
      - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
      - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
      
      See merge request !5087
    • Merge branch '20371-artifacts_present_db_check' into 'master' · df60723e
      Rémy Coutable authored
      Check for Ci::Build artifacts at database level
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      Check for the presence of artifacts not expired at database level
      
      ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
      
      N/A
      
      ## Why was this MR needed?
      
      To try to improve a little the performance of the pipelines page
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      Closes #20371
      
      ## Screenshots (if relevant)
      
      N/A
      
      ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
      
      - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
      - ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
      - ~~[ ] API support added~~
      - Tests
        - [x] Added for this feature/bug
        - [ ] All builds are passing
      - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
      - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
      - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
      
      
      See merge request !5543
    • Merge branch '14775-diff-collection-iteration' into 'master' · 41057b85
      Yorick Peterse authored
      Bump gitlab_git to speedup DiffCollection iterations
      
      See merge request !5564
    • Method for returning issues readable by a user · 002ad215
      Yorick Peterse authored
      The method Ability.issues_readable_by_user takes a list of users and an
      optional user and returns an Array of issues readable by said user. This
      method in turn is used by
      Banzai::ReferenceParser::IssueParser#nodes_visible_to_user so this
      method no longer needs to get all the available abilities just to check
      if a user has the "read_issue" ability.
      
      To test this I benchmarked an issue with 222 comments on my development
      environment. Using these changes the time spent in nodes_visible_to_user
      was reduced from around 120 ms to around 40 ms.
    • Merge branch '18193-no-one-can-push' into 'master' · 242f8377
      Rémy Coutable authored
      Allow creating protected branches that can't be pushed to
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      - Add "No one can push" as a setting to protected branches.
      - This applies to Masters (as well as all other users)
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      Closes #18193 
      
      ## Does this need an EE merge request?
      
      Yes. gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!569
      
      ## Screenshots
      
      ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-29_at_3.14.59_PM](/uploads/2e8774c311763bc6e570501a2e6cabf7/Screen_Shot_2016-07-29_at_3.14.59_PM.png)
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [ ]  #18193 !5081 No one can push to protected branches
          - [x]  Implementation
              - [x]  Model changes
                  - [x]  Remove "developers_can_merge" and "developers_can_push"
                  - [x]  Replace with `ProtectedBranchPushAccess` and `ProtectedBranchMergeAccess`
                      - [x]  Reversible migration
                      - [x]  Raise error on failure
                      - [x]  MySQL
              - [x]  Backend changes
                  - [x]  Creating a protected branch creates access rows
                  - [x]  Add `no_one` as an access level
                  - [x]  Enforce "no one can push" 
                  - [x]  Allow setting levels while creating protected branches?
              - [x]  Frontend
                  - [x]  Replace checkboxes with `select`s
          - [x]  Add tests
          - [x]  `GitPushService` -> new projects' default branch protection
          - [x]  Fix existing tests
          - [x]  Refactor
          - [x]  Test workflows by hand
              - [x]  from the Web UI
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Push" is "No one"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Masters can't push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Push" is "Developers + Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can push
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Push" is "Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Developers + Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Developers + Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "No one"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can't push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "No one"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can't push
              - [x]  from CLI
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Push" is "No one"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Masters can't push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Push" is "Developers + Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can push
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Push" is "Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Developers + Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "Masters"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can merge
                      - [x]  Masters can push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Developers + Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "No one"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can't push
                  - [x]  When "Allowed to Merge" is "Masters" and "Allowed to Push" is "No one"
                      - [x]  Developers can't push
                      - [x]  Developers can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can't merge
                      - [x]  Masters can't push
          - [x]  Add tests for owners and admins
          - [x]  CHANGELOG
          - [x]  Screenshots
          - [x]  Documentation
          - [x]  Wait for ~~!4665~~ to be merged in
          - [x]  Wait for ~~gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#19872~~ and ~~gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!564~~ to be closed
          - [x]  Rebase against master instead of !4892
          - [x]  Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/a4ca206fd1cc0332d1e385ddbc0f2e4065c3ae73/builds) is green
          - [x]  Create EE MR
              - [x]  Cherry pick commits
              - [x]  Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/commit/4e17190d7dc546c1f977edcafd1cbcea4bdb4043/builds) is green
          - [x]  Address @axil's comments
          - [x]  Assign to endboss
          - [x]  Wait for @dbalexandre's review
          - [x]  Address @dbalexandre's comments
          - [x]  Address @axil's comments
              - [x]  Align dropdowns
              - [x]  No flash when protected branch is updated
          - [x]  Resolve conflicts
          - [x]  Implement protect/unprotect API
          - [x]  Address @dbalexandre's comments
          - [x]  Update EE MR
          - [x]  Address @rymai's comments
              - [x]  Create/Update service should return a `ProtectedBranch`
              - [x]  Successfuly protected branch creation shouldn't `load_protected_branches`
              - [x]  Rename `allowed_to_merge` as #minimum_access_level_for_merge
              - [x]  Rename `allowed_to_push` as #minimum_access_level_for_push
              - [x]  Use `inclusion` and `Gitlab::Access` instead of an `enum`
              - [x]  Modify `check_access` to work with `Gitlab::Access`
              - [x]  Pass `@protected_branch` to `#execute` in `UpdateService`
              - [x]  simplify with a nested field `protected_branch[push_access_level][access_level]`
              - [x]  `developers_can_{merge,push}` should be handled in the API
              - [x]  Use `can?(current_user, ...)` instead of `current_user.can?(...)`
              - [x]  Instantiate `ProtectedBranchesAccessSelect` in `dispatcher.js`
              - [x]  constants regarding downtime migrations
              - [x]  Explicit `#down` for columns with default
          - [x]  Update EE MR
          - [ ]  Wait for CE merge
          - [ ]  Wait for EE merge
          - [ ]  Create issue for UI changes proposed by @zyv
      
      
      See merge request !5081
    • Implement final review comments from @rymai. · cebcc417
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. Instantiate `ProtectedBranchesAccessSelect` from `dispatcher`
      
      2. Use `can?(user, ...)` instead of `user.can?(...)`
      
      3. Add `DOWNTIME` notes to all migrations added in !5081.
      
      4. Add an explicit `down` method for migrations removing the
         `developers_can_push` and `developers_can_merge` columns, ensuring that
         the columns created (on rollback) have the appropriate defaults.
      
      5. Remove duplicate CHANGELOG entries.
      
      6. Blank lines after guard clauses.
    • Use `Gitlab::Access` to protected branch access levels. · 0a8aeb46
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. It makes sense to reuse these constants since we had them duplicated
         in the previous enum implementation. This also simplifies our
         `check_access` implementation, because we can use
         `project.team.max_member_access` directly.
      
      2. Use `accepts_nested_attributes_for` to create push/merge access
         levels. This was a bit fiddly to set up, but this simplifies our code
         by quite a large amount. We can even get rid of
         `ProtectedBranches::BaseService`.
      
      3. Move API handling back into the API (previously in
         `ProtectedBranches::BaseService#translate_api_params`.
      
      4. The protected branch services now return a `ProtectedBranch` rather
         than `true/false`.
      
      5. Run `load_protected_branches` on-demand in the `create` action, to
         prevent it being called unneccessarily.
      
      6. "Masters" is pre-selected as the default option for "Allowed to Push"
         and "Allowed to Merge".
      
      7. These changes were based on a review from @rymai in !5081.
    • Fix `git_push_service_spec` · c93a895a
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. Caused by incorrect test setup. The user wasn't added to the project,
         so protected branch creation failed authorization.
      
      2. Change setup for a different test (`Event.last` to
         `Event.find_by_action`) because our `project.team << ...` addition
         was causing a conflict.
    • Authorize user before creating/updating a protected branch. · 6d841eaa
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. This is a third line of defence (first in the view, second in the
         controller).
      
      2. Duplicate the `API::Helpers.to_boolean` method in `BaseService`. The
         other alternative is to `include API::Helpers`, but this brings with it
         a number of other methods that might cause conflicts.
      
      3. Return a 403 if authorization fails.
    • Have the `branches` API work with the new protected branches data model. · 01d190a8
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. The new data model moves from `developers_can_{push,merge}` to
         `allowed_to_{push,merge}`.
      
      2. The API interface has not been changed. It still accepts
         `developers_can_push` and `developers_can_merge` as options. These
         attributes are inferred from the new data model.
      
      3. Modify the protected branch create/update services to translate from
         the API interface to our current data model.
    • Implement review comments from @axil. · 88fd401d
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. Align "Allowed to Merge" and "Allowed to Push" dropdowns.
      
      2. Don't display a flash every time a protected branch is updated.
         Previously, we were using this so the test has something to hook onto
         before the assertion. Now we're using `wait_for_ajax` instead.
    • Remove duplicate specs from `git_access_spec` · a72d4491
      Timothy Andrew authored
      - Likely introduced during an improper conflict resolution.
    • Implement review comments from @dbalexandre. · 7b2ad2d5
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. Remove `master_or_greater?` and `developer_or_greater?` in favor of
         `max_member_access`, which is a lot nicer.
      
      2. Remove a number of instances of `include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers`
         in migrations that don't need this module. Also remove comments where
         not necessary.
      
      3. Remove duplicate entry in CHANGELOG.
      
      4. Move `ProtectedBranchAccessSelect` from Coffeescript to ES6.
      
      5. Split the `set_access_levels!` method in two - one each for `merge` and
         `push` access levels.
    • Add changelog entry. · 8e25ddc5
      Timothy Andrew authored
    • Admins count as masters too. · cc1cebdc
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. In the context of protected branches.
      
      2. Test this behaviour.
    • Make specs compatible with PhantomJS versions < 2. · 4d6dadc8
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. These versions of PhantomJS don't support `PATCH` requests, so we use
         a `POST` with `_method` set to `PATCH`.
    • Humanize protected branches' access levels at one location. · f2df2966
      Timothy Andrew authored
      1. The model now contains this humanization data, which is the once
         source of truth.
      
      2. Previously, this was being listed out in the dropdown component as well.