add pipeline id to merge request metrics table. Also, updated the pipeline worker to populate this field.

- Refactored cycle analytics class to extract DB logic
- Reuse logic in new events fetcher
- Started adding cycle analytics events class and spec (still not functional)

tests: Move rake assets:precompile and cloning gitlab-{shell,test} to the prepare stage

Related to #23034

See merge request !7512

Update the updated_at of a build while patching the trace

## What does this MR do?

Fixes build patching trace. It should update the `updated_at` field of a build to make sure it will not be removed by `stuck_ci_builds_worker`.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Construction of a test for the bug.

## Why was this MR needed?

Please read #22087 for a reference.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #22087

See merge request !7146

Added colored labels to related MR list.

## What does this MR do?
Added colored labels to related MR list.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Yes, I think haml can be better.

## Why was this MR needed?
There was an issue for this #21200 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-15_at_21.04.24](/uploads/b601f33f23cdc3318d01279e17deb096/Screen_Shot_2016-11-15_at_21.04.24.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes !21200

See merge request !7486

explicitly disable eslint inline

## What does this MR do?

Explicitly disables eslint inline.

I.E. `/* eslint-disable */` => `/* eslint-disable max-len, no-new, ... */`

I used the script from https://gitlab.com/lbennett/eslint-dsblr.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

It will help refactor out eslint issues for older files.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7229

Fix some failing specs due to missing access_requestable trait

See merge request !7510

Fix POST /internal/allowed to cope with gitlab-shell v4.0.0 project paths

Closes #24496

See merge request !7480

fix shibboleth misconfigurations resulting in authentication bypass

This merge request fixes #22267 where a misconfigured Shibboleth `HTTP_UID` or `HTTP_EPPN` could result in users being logged into an account that did not belong to them.

See merge request !7428

Fix issue where "Without projects" filter admin area shows 0 users incorrectly. Before this fix, if any outstanding group or project invitations exist the count show as 0.

Fixes #3367

See merge request !6611

Allow commit note to be visible if repo is visible

## What does this MR do?

It enforces the `:download_code` permission in `Event#visible_to_user?` for commit notes.

Closes #23824

See merge request !7504

Stopped multiple requests with dropdowns

## What does this MR do?

Fixes an issue where the user dropdown would send 2 requests when the user opens the dropdown.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #24131

See merge request !7505

Fixed issue boards counter border when unauthorized

## What does this MR do?

When the user is unauthorized & view issue boards, the border on the counter will not be the whole way around. This fixes that. 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_13.03.36](/uploads/54d97f7f4114044aad3bdc78961a31c8/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_13.03.36.png)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #23664

See merge request !7501

Defer saving project services to the database if there are no user changes

## What does this MR do?

It defers saving project services to the database as long as it is possible. It creates a project service when creating a project only if this project service has an active template. After that project services are saved on the first edit.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

- tests that used `build_missing_services` before the change
- number of queries executed

## Why was this MR needed?

Motivation in #22281

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #22281

See merge request !6958

Search for a filename in a project

Closes #23117

See merge request !7426