BigW Consortium Gitlab

  1. 13 Dec, 2016 2 commits
  2. 11 Dec, 2016 2 commits
  3. 09 Dec, 2016 3 commits
  4. 08 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  5. 07 Dec, 2016 2 commits
  6. 06 Dec, 2016 12 commits
  7. 05 Dec, 2016 3 commits
  8. 02 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  9. 01 Dec, 2016 4 commits
  10. 29 Nov, 2016 4 commits
  11. 28 Nov, 2016 4 commits
  12. 25 Nov, 2016 2 commits
    • Add keyword arguments to truncated_diff method · a761c59a
      hhoopes authored
      * Added keyword arguments to truncated_diff_lines method to allow for using highlighting or not (html templates vs. text)
      * Tweaked templates for consistency and format appropriateness
    • Change diff highlight/truncate for reusability · f928dba9
      hhoopes authored
      Previously the `truncated_diff_lines` method for outputting a discussion diff took in already highlighted lines, which meant it wasn't reuseable for truncating ANY lines. In the way it was used, it also meant that for any email truncation, the whole diff was being highlighted before being truncated, meaning wasted time highlighting lines that wouldn't even be used (granted, they were being memoized, so perhaps this wasn't that great of an issue). I refactored truncation away from highlighting, in order to truncate formatted diffs for text templates in email, using `>`s to designate each line, but otherwise retaining the parsing already done to create `diff_lines`.
      
      Additionally, while notes on merge requests or commits had already been tested, there was no existing test for notes on a diff on an MR or commit. Added mailer tests for such, and a unit test for truncating diff lines.