- 27 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
- 26 Oct, 2016 39 commits
-
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Enable PseudoElement in scss-lint ## What does this MR do? Enables `PseudoElement` in `.scss-lint.yml` ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? None ## Why was this MR needed? Improve SCSS maintainability and consistency ## Screenshots (if relevant) None ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #23485 See merge request !7083
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Resolve "Admin/Overview/Users mobile view" ## What does this MR do? Fixes mobile layout issues on `/admin/users` page. * Fixes control element placement when long usernames or email addresses overflow their container * Fixes condensed dropdown menu (issue caused by acde2e30) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-28_at_3.29.11_PM](/uploads/82cd27c367653beb29425065685274dd/Screen_Shot_2016-09-28_at_3.29.11_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-29_at_23.36.40](/uploads/e739638506388be9c5a0709e5f22b298/Screen_Shot_2016-09-29_at_23.36.40.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-24_at_11.55.32_PM](/uploads/ab6e49da85688d9fd2abc49de238a5bf/Screen_Shot_2016-10-24_at_11.55.32_PM.png) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Ensure css changes don't have any side effects elsewhere in GitLab. (I don't think they would...) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22746 See merge request !7087
-
Clement Ho authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
Show full status link on MR & commit pipelines Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-24_at_2.43.09_PM](/uploads/5543b6e134a5349650b24dcb1b1a9082/Screen_Shot_2016-10-24_at_2.43.09_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-24_at_2.42.55_PM](/uploads/a561c8708ca2b17d11c0eb9b2cfd0b9b/Screen_Shot_2016-10-24_at_2.42.55_PM.png) Closes #23607 See merge request !7079
-
Fatih Acet authored
Add ESLint ## What does this MR do? - create `package.json` - add ESLint dependencies to `package.json` - add JavaScript linting to CI - add Rake task `lint:javascript`as alias for `eslint` (which itself is an alias for `npm run eslint`) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Probably not. ## Why was this MR needed? My hovercraft was full of eels. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13224#note_12537431 - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5006#note_13255658 See merge request !5445
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Resolve "Lacking padding on syntax highlight blocks in diff comments" ## What does this MR do? Enforces horizontal padding on highlight block. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? There was no horizontal padding on diff comment highlight blocks. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-23_at_01.48.10](/uploads/6d7a426c0856e8787b63b2c02672298a/Screen_Shot_2016-10-23_at_01.48.10.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23661 See merge request !7062
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
Refactored less readable existance checks ## What does this MR do? Clean up complex JavaScript expressions generated by conditional assignment and existence checks in CoffeeScript. These are small changes that effect 1 or 2 lines at a time, but should make sections of code more readable. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Changes in [gl_dropdown.js](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js) don't do much (largely just splitting stuff onto multiple lines). Is this a bit pointless? ## Why was this MR needed? Auto-generated JS contains complex expressions that will be difficult to work with in future. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? A child issue of #21887 Closes #21988 See merge request !6289
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Add all endoints to JIRA service API documentation ## What does this MR do? Add missing API endpoints to the JIRA service. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/440 See merge request !7122
-
Mike Greiling authored
-
Mike Greiling authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
We don't need to run `ee_compat_check` against `master` See merge request !7119
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Add a trigger variable to docs trigger job See merge request !7089
-
Jack Davison authored
CoffeeScript generated JavaScript contains some unreadable expressions. This refactoring addresses complex uses of the exestential operator that produced unreadable Javascript.
-
Rémy Coutable authored
See merge request !7086
-
Daniel Voogsgerd authored
Changed .visable-sm to .visible-sm Fixes #23745 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Fatih Acet authored
Issue board sidebar ## What does this MR do? Adds a sidebar when clicking an issue in the issue boards lists. This allows user to easily update other parts of the issue details without having to visit the issue itself. Same functionality as on issue page. When creating a new issue the sidebar automatically opens. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-07_at_13.10.16](/uploads/ad08785f407d8ac3fe9cb078868a7839/Screen_Shot_2016-10-07_at_13.10.16.png) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21219 See merge request !6690
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix refs dropdown selection with special characters ## What does this MR do? Remove unneeded encode from the project-refs-dropdown renderRow method. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![2016-10-23_01.20.19](/uploads/1f176b2aa633093851799ae9f70f116b/2016-10-23_01.20.19.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21248 See merge request !7061
-
Robert Speicher authored
Fix Sidekiq process stats in admin area Closes #23825 See merge request !7116
-
Robert Speicher authored
Fix filtering of milestones with quotes in title Closes #23268 See merge request !6900
-
Airat Shigapov authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
users should remove former Go installation folder ## What does this MR do? It ensure users installing or updating from source will remove their former Go installation folder in `/usr/local/go`, to avoid raising errors that could lead to new issues being created. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? 1. The `rm -rf` should not be verbose if folder does not exists. 1. May a user have some kind of configuration files in this folder ? ## Why was this MR needed? I did faced the error, that led me to the solution stated here : https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse/issues/29#note_4155517 gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse#29 See merge request !6602
-
Rémy Coutable authored
See merge request !6784
-
Joshua Welsh authored
When adding a deploy key that already exists in the project the existing key would not be returned, resulting in an attempt to create a new one, which in turn caused a 500 error due to an ActiveRecord exception. When adding a deploy key that exists within another project the key would be joined to the project, but would also attempt to create a new one, which resulted in a 400 error due to the key already existing. Fixes #22741 Fixes #21754 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
See merge request !6915
-
Sam Rose authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Grapify tags API ## What does this MR do? Add the Grape-DSL to the tags API. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? The delete endpoint only has a description but no success entity because we don't have one. We only return the branch name as JSON. Should I do something else? ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Related to #22928 See merge request !6860
-
Robert Schilling authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
winniehell authored
-
winniehell authored
-
winniehell authored
-
winniehell authored
-
winniehell authored
ESLint config: https://github.com/airbnb/javascript
-
blackst0ne authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Stan Hu authored
Remove use of wait_for_ajax since jQuery was removed Fixes #23812 See merge request !7111
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
Replace jquery-cookie plugin with js-cookie ## What does this MR do? Removes an outdated and unmaintained dependency [jquery.cookie](https://github.com/carhartl/jquery-cookie) with its successor [js.cookie](https://github.com/js-cookie/js-cookie) which is not dependent on jQuery. Also this MR adds a global default cookie `path` setting which defaults to the GitLab root directory. Now, setting a cookie to any path other than `gon.relative_url_root` requires an explicit opt-out. This is a sensible default and should prevent accidental omission going forward. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Double check that all instances of `$.cookie(x)` have been replaced by `Cookies.get(x)` and all instances of `$.cookie(x, y, z)` are replaced with `Cookies.set(x, y, z)`. All javascripts which set or retrieve cookie values should function just as before. ## Why was this MR needed? One more step toward shaking off jQuery as a dependency (#23022), also [jquery.cookie](https://github.com/carhartl/jquery-cookie) is no longer maintained and hasn't seen an update in 2+ years. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #23022 See merge request !7085
-