BigW Consortium Gitlab

  1. 10 Jun, 2016 13 commits
    • Merge branch 'ruianderson/gitlab-ce-option-to-allow-or-not-merge-failed-builds' into 'master' · 43f2d8ad
      Rémy Coutable authored
      Add option to restrict merge MR with failed build
      
      _Originally opened at !3828 by @ruianderson._
      
      -----
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      This MR adds an option to prevent MR from being merged if their build status is not a success. Please note that if the MR has no `ci_commit`, the MR can be merged (i.e. we don't enforce builds to be configured).
      
      ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
      
      Probably the copy in the edit project's page and in the documentation.
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      Closes #5940.
      
      ## Screenshots
      
      ![only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds](/uploads/bb43cf131f680c9af0eb2ea5155189e0/only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds.png)
      
      See merge request !4503
    • Rename ci_commit -> pipeline · 3579edba
      Rémy Coutable authored
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
    • Rename MergeRequest#cannot_be_merged_because_build_is_not_success? to #mergeable_ci_state? · 5324c936
      Rémy Coutable authored
      The logic of the method was obviously inverted.
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
    • Improve initial implementation of the 'only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds.rb' feature · 6dff7c17
      Rémy Coutable authored
      Based on the feedback from reviewers.
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
    • Allow or not merge MR with failed build · 07dbd6b3
      Rui Anderson authored
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
    • Merge branch 'fix-already-initialized-constant' into 'master' · 9734b8bb
      Stan Hu authored
      Don't require Gitlab::Redis in mail_room.yml if it's already defined
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      Avoid requiring `lib/gitlab/redis.rb` if `Gitlab::Redis` is already defined.
      
      ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
      
      No.
      
      ## Why was this MR needed?
      
      Because otherwise you get `already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::XXX`, e.g.:
      
      ```
      › bin/rspec spec/config/mail_room_spec.rb
      Running via Spring preloader in process 24658
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:3: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::CACHE_NAMESPACE 
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:3: warning: previous definition of CACHE_NAMESPACE was here
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:4: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::SESSION_NAMESPACE
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:4: warning: previous definition of SESSION_NAMESPACE was here
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:5: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::SIDEKIQ_NAMESPACE
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:5: warning: previous definition of SIDEKIQ_NAMESPACE was here
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:12: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::URL_MUTEX
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:12: warning: previous definition of URL_MUTEX was here
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:13: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::POOL_MUTEX
      /Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:13: warning: previous definition of POOL_MUTEX was here
       2/2 |================================================= 100 =================================================>| Time: 00:00:00 
      
      Finished in 0.38505 seconds (files took 0.48292 seconds to load)
      2 examples, 0 failures
      ```
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      None!
      
      ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
      
      - [x] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ Not needed.
      - [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ Not needed.
      - [x] ~~API support added.~~ Not needed.
      - [x] ~~Tests.~~ Not needed.
      - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
      - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
      - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
      
      See merge request !4586
    • Merge branch 'cs-issue-pr-templates' into 'master' · cfc99bbd
      Rémy Coutable authored
      Add Issue/PR Templates to deter issues/contributions on the GitHub mirror of the project
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      Adds GitHub-specific `ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md` and `PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` files in a `.github` directory. To prevent new issues/PRs, I figured it'd be good to direct users/contributors to open issues/contribute code in the "correct" project.
      
      ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
      Wording/phrasing, mostly.
      
      ## Why was this MR needed?
      The GitHub issue tracker is being closed, and PRs on GitHub haven't been accepted for a while now. This was discussed briefly during the GitLab Strategy Session at the Austin Summit.
      
      cc: @dzaporozhets @rymai  @MrChrisW @dblessing @virtuacreative @amara  
      
      See merge request !4324
    • Merge branch 'enable-rubocop-for-migrations' into 'master' · 0dcd050b
      Douwe Maan authored
      Enable RuboCop for migrations
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      Enable RuboCop for all files inside `db/migrate`, then add magic comments to all existing files, so that this only affects new migrations.
      
      ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
      
      This entire change is a config change and a bunch of comments.
      
      ## Why was this MR needed?
      
      ```
      Yorick Peterse [11:55 AM]  
      I don't think we have any use case for nested def, might as well blacklist it
      
      Sean McGivern [11:57 AM]  
      http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop/RuboCop/Cop/Lint/NestedMethodDefinition
      
      Sean McGivern [11:57 AM]  
      hmm, it's already enabled
      
      Sean McGivern [11:57 AM]  
      ... because we exclude `db/` from rubocop 🙂
      
      Douwe Maan [11:57 AM]  
      @smcgivern: heh
      
      Sean McGivern [11:59 AM]  
      I guess that's because we don't want to change the old migrations? I wonder if it's worth enabling it and adding magic comments to all the previous ones to ignore rubocop
      
      Douwe Maan [11:59 AM]  
      @smcgivern: agreed
      ```
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      None.
      
      ## Screenshots (if relevant)
      
      None, but if I remove the magic comment from the migration `20160416182152_convert_award_note_to_emoji_award.rb` I get:
      ```
      $ be rubocop
      Inspecting 1959 files
      ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................W....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
      
      Offenses:
      
      db/migrate/20160416182152_convert_award_note_to_emoji_award.rb:3:5: W: Lint/NestedMethodDefinition: Method definitions must not be nested. Use lambda instead.
          def up ...
          ^^^^^^
      
      1959 files inspected, 1 offense detected
      ```
      
      ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
      
      - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
      - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
      - [ ] API support added
      - [ ] Tests
        - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
        - [ ] All builds are passing
      - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
      - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
      - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
      
      See merge request !4559
    • Merge branch 'gh-rate-limit' into 'master' · a9a9f19b
      Douwe Maan authored
      Wrap all rate limiting logic inside GitHub API client
      
      ## What does this MR do?
      
      Move the actual rate limiting logic to GitHub API to clean the code inside the GitHub importer, and avoid code duplication.
      
      ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
      
      No there aren't.
      
      ## Why was this MR needed?
      
      Avoid code duplication to handle API rate limit in every call to the GitHub API.
      
      ## What are the relevant issue numbers?
      
      There are none.
      
      ## Screenshots (if relevant)
      
      Not relevant.
      
      See merge request !4552
    • Merge branch '18447-investigate-smtp-error' into 'master' · e0f3e44b
      Douwe Maan authored
      Fix failing `EmailOnPush` spec.
      
      Closes #18447 
      
      - This should fix CI on master
      
      /cc @smcgivern @ayufan @stanhu @pacoguzman 
      
      See merge request !4582
    • Fix failing `EmailOnPush` spec. · 99d5a91d
      Timothy Andrew authored
  2. 09 Jun, 2016 27 commits