BigW Consortium Gitlab

  1. 20 Nov, 2013 1 commit
  2. 12 Nov, 2013 1 commit
  3. 07 Nov, 2013 1 commit
  4. 05 Nov, 2013 1 commit
  5. 04 Nov, 2013 1 commit
    • More escaping · c46eaca9
      Nigel Kukard authored
      - Database name may contain characters which are not shell friendly
      - Database password could contain the same
      - While we at it there is no harm in escaping generated paths too
      - Refactored 2-line system(command)
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarNigel Kukard <nkukard@lbsd.net>
  6. 17 Oct, 2013 1 commit
  7. 16 Oct, 2013 1 commit
  8. 08 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  9. 18 Jul, 2013 4 commits
    • Style changes from review with @randx · d9959427
      Izaak Alpert authored
      -Some changes around calling origional methods for !for_fork? merge requests. Other changes to follow
      
      Change-Id: I009c716ce2475b9efa3fd07aee9215fca7a1c150
    • Rebased on 6.0 · 128f2845
      Izaak Alpert authored
      -Had to do some minor test clean up as well
      
      Change-Id: I8f378f1b5fe676d73b8691e870c11ca6def90cbf
    • Fix intermittently failing notification_service test · 216d5e2c
      Izaak Alpert authored
      Change-Id: Ic23cb46901f8adc77943bf3cc79566587364e22a
    • Merge Request on forked projects · 3d7194f0
      Izaak Alpert authored
      The good:
      
       - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work).
       - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects
       - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests
       - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate
      
      The questionable:
      
       - Events only know about target projects
       - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target
       - All operations performed in the satellite
      
      The bad:
      
        -  Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between)
      
      (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos)
      
      Fixes:
      
      Make test repos/satellites only create when needed
      -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap)
      -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually
      -fixed remote removal
      -How to merge renders properly
      -Update emails to show project/branches
      -Edit MR doesn't set target branch
      -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test
      -Added back a test around merge request observer
      -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers
      -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well
      -Signifant speed ups for tests
      -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests
      -Remove wiki schema update
      Fixes for search/search results
      -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects
      -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project
      -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request
      
      Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
  10. 26 Jun, 2013 1 commit
  11. 22 Jun, 2013 1 commit
  12. 27 Apr, 2013 1 commit
  13. 11 Apr, 2013 2 commits
  14. 10 Apr, 2013 1 commit
  15. 01 Apr, 2013 4 commits