BigW Consortium Gitlab

Commit edbdb94e by Forest Godfrey

Stop CI jobs

parent 3571b97e
<!---
Please read this!
Before opening a new issue, make sure to search for keywords in the issues
filtered by the "regression" or "bug" label.
For the Community Edition issue tracker:
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues?label_name%5B%5D=regression
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues?label_name%5B%5D=bug
For the Enterprise Edition issue tracker:
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues?label_name%5B%5D=regression
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues?label_name%5B%5D=bug
and verify the issue you're about to submit isn't a duplicate.
--->
### Summary
(Summarize the bug encountered concisely)
### Steps to reproduce
(How one can reproduce the issue - this is very important)
### Example Project
(If possible, please create an example project here on GitLab.com that exhibits the problematic behaviour, and link to it here in the bug report)
(If you are using an older version of GitLab, this will also determine whether the bug has been fixed in a more recent version)
### What is the current *bug* behavior?
(What actually happens)
### What is the expected *correct* behavior?
(What you should see instead)
### Relevant logs and/or screenshots
(Paste any relevant logs - please use code blocks (```) to format console output,
logs, and code as it's very hard to read otherwise.)
### Output of checks
(If you are reporting a bug on GitLab.com, write: This bug happens on GitLab.com)
#### Results of GitLab environment info
<details>
<summary>Expand for output related to GitLab environment info</summary>
<pre>
(For installations with omnibus-gitlab package run and paste the output of:
`sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`)
(For installations from source run and paste the output of:
`sudo -u git -H bundle exec rake gitlab:env:info RAILS_ENV=production`)
</pre>
</details>
#### Results of GitLab application Check
<details>
<summary>Expand for output related to the GitLab application check</summary>
<pre>
(For installations with omnibus-gitlab package run and paste the output of:
`sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:check SANITIZE=true`)
(For installations from source run and paste the output of:
`sudo -u git -H bundle exec rake gitlab:check RAILS_ENV=production SANITIZE=true`)
(we will only investigate if the tests are passing)
</pre>
</details>
### Possible fixes
(If you can, link to the line of code that might be responsible for the problem)
/label ~bug
### Description
(Include problem, use cases, benefits, and/or goals)
### Proposal
### Links / references
/label ~"feature proposal"
### Background:
(Include problem, use cases, benefits, and/or goals)
**What questions are you trying to answer?**
**Are you looking to verify an existing hypothesis or uncover new issues you should be exploring?**
**What is the backstory of this project and how does it impact the approach?**
**What do you already know about the areas you are exploring?**
**What does success look like at the end of the project?**
### Links / references:
/label ~"UX research"
<!--
# Read me first!
Create this issue under https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq
Set the title to: `[Security] Description of the original issue`
-->
### Prior to the security release
- [ ] Read the [security process for developers] if you are not familiar with it.
- [ ] Link to the original issue adding it to the [links section](#links)
- [ ] Run `scripts/security-harness` in the CE, EE, and/or Omnibus to prevent pushing to any remote besides `dev.gitlab.org`
- [ ] Create an MR targetting `org` `master`, prefixing your branch with `security-`
- [ ] Label your MR with the ~security label, prefix the title with `WIP: [master]`
- [ ] Add a link to the MR to the [links section](#links)
- [ ] Add a link to an EE MR if required
- [ ] Make sure the MR remains in-progress and gets approved after the review cycle, **but never merged**.
- [ ] Assign the MR to a RM once is reviewed and ready to be merged. Check the [RM list] to see who to ping.
#### Backports
- [ ] Once the MR is ready to be merged, create MRs targetting the last 3 releases
- [ ] At this point, it might be easy to squash the commits from the MR into one
- You can use the script `bin/secpick` instead of the following steps, to help you cherry-picking. See the [seckpick documentation]
- [ ] Create the branch `security-X-Y` from `X-Y-stable` if it doesn't exist (and make sure it's up to date with stable)
- [ ] Create each MR targetting the security branch `security-X-Y`
- [ ] Add the ~security label and prefix with the version `WIP: [X.Y]` the title of the MR
- [ ] Make sure all MRs have a link in the [links section](#links) and are assigned to a Release Manager.
[seckpick documentation]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/master/general/security/developer.md#secpick-script
#### Documentation and final details
- [ ] Check the topic on #security to see when the next release is going to happen and add a link to the [links section](#links)
- [ ] Find out the versions affected (the Git history of the files affected may help you with this) and add them to the [details section](#details)
- [ ] Fill in any upgrade notes that users may need to take into account in the [details section](#details)
- [ ] Add Yes/No and further details if needed to the migration and settings columns in the [details section](#details)
- [ ] Add the nickname of the external user who found the issue (and/or HackerOne profile) to the Thanks row in the [details section](#details)
### Summary
#### Links
| Description | Link |
| -------- | -------- |
| Original issue | #TODO |
| Security release issue | #TODO |
| `master` MR | !TODO |
| `master` MR (EE) | !TODO |
| `Backport X.Y` MR | !TODO |
| `Backport X.Y` MR | !TODO |
| `Backport X.Y` MR | !TODO |
| `Backport X.Y` MR (EE) | !TODO |
| `Backport X.Y` MR (EE) | !TODO |
| `Backport X.Y` MR (EE) | !TODO |
#### Details
| Description | Details | Further details|
| -------- | -------- | -------- |
| Versions affected | X.Y | |
| Upgrade notes | | |
| GitLab Settings updated | Yes/No| |
| Migration required | Yes/No | |
| Thanks | | |
[security process for developers]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/master/general/security/developer.md
[RM list]: https://about.gitlab.com/release-managers/
/label ~security
Add a description of your merge request here. Merge requests without an adequate
description will not be reviewed until one is added.
## Database Checklist
When adding migrations:
- [ ] Updated `db/schema.rb`
- [ ] Added a `down` method so the migration can be reverted
- [ ] Added the output of the migration(s) to the MR body
- [ ] Added tests for the migration in `spec/migrations` if necessary (e.g. when migrating data)
When adding or modifying queries to improve performance:
- [ ] Included data that shows the performance improvement, preferably in the form of a benchmark
- [ ] Included the output of `EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)` of the relevant queries
When adding foreign keys to existing tables:
- [ ] Included a migration to remove orphaned rows in the source table before adding the foreign key
- [ ] Removed any instances of `dependent: ...` that may no longer be necessary
When adding tables:
- [ ] Ordered columns based on the [Ordering Table Columns](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/ordering_table_columns.html#ordering-table-columns) guidelines
- [ ] Added foreign keys to any columns pointing to data in other tables
- [ ] Added indexes for fields that are used in statements such as WHERE, ORDER BY, GROUP BY, and JOINs
When removing columns, tables, indexes or other structures:
- [ ] Removed these in a post-deployment migration
- [ ] Made sure the application no longer uses (or ignores) these structures
## General Checklist
- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/changelog.html) added, if necessary
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/doc_styleguide.html)
- [ ] API support added
- [ ] Tests added for this feature/bug
- Conform by the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html)
- [ ] Has been reviewed by a Backend maintainer
- [ ] Has been reviewed by a Database specialist
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] If you have multiple commits, please combine them into a few logically organized commits by [squashing them](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
- [ ] Internationalization required/considered
- [ ] If paid feature, have we considered GitLab.com plan and how it works for groups and is there a design for promoting it to users who aren't on the correct plan
- [ ] End-to-end tests pass (`package-and-qa` manual pipeline job)
/label ~database
<!--See the general Documentation guidelines https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/writing_documentation.html -->
## What does this MR do?
<!-- Briefly describe what this MR is about -->
## Related issues
<!-- Mention the issue(s) this MR closes or is related to -->
Closes
## Moving docs to a new location?
Read the guidelines:
https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/writing_documentation.html#changing-document-location
- [ ] Make sure the old link is not removed and has its contents replaced with
a link to the new location.
- [ ] Make sure internal links pointing to the document in question are not broken.
- [ ] Search and replace any links referring to old docs in GitLab Rails app,
specifically under the `app/views/` and `ee/app/views` (for GitLab EE) directories.
- [ ] Make sure to add [`redirect_from`](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/writing_documentation.html#redirections-for-pages-with-disqus-comments)
to the new document if there are any Disqus comments on the old document thread.
- [ ] If working on CE and the `ee-compat-check` jobs fails, submit an MR to EE
with the changes as well (https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/writing_documentation.html#cherry-picking-from-ce-to-ee).
- [ ] Ping one of the technical writers for review.
/label ~Documentation
# Documentation
- source: /doc/(.+?)\.md/ # doc/administration/build_artifacts.md
public: '\1.html' # doc/administration/build_artifacts.html
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment